- A Brief Introduction to the Movement
- Bishop Henry McNeal Turner
- Word Travels Fast: 1855 Philadelphia
- Henry Highland Garnet's "Address"
- What Did They Eat? Where Did They Stay?
- Black Wealth and the 1843 Convention
- African American Women's Economic Power
- The First National Convention
- The "Conventions" of the Conventions: Political Rituals
- Conventions by City
- National Conventions
- Women Delegates
- Women in the Conventions
- Convention Hosts by Denomination
- Conventions by Level
- Clusters of Conventions
- Colored Conventions in Canada
- Delegate Search
- Women in the Conventions | March 8, 2017
- About Us
- Contact Us
Scripto | Transcribe Page
Proceedings of the National Convention of the Colored Men of America: held in Washington, D.C., on January 13, 14, 15, and 16, 1869.
1869 National Convention in Washington DC 38.pdf
- Type what you see in the pdf, even if it's misspelled or incorrect.
- Leave a blank line before each new paragraph.
- Type page numbers if they appear.
- Put unclear words in brackets, with a question mark, like: [[Pittsburg?]]
- Click "Save transcription" frequently!
- Include hyphens splitting words at the end of a line. Type the full word without the hyphen. If a hyphen appears at the end of a page, type the full word on the second page.
- Include indents, tabs, or extra spaces.
Is this transcription complete and correct?
Please let us know:
Current Saved Transcription [history]
FOURTH DAYS PROCEEDINGS. SATURDAY, Jam. 16th, 1869. The Convention met at 9 30, A. M. Rev. H. H. Garnett, of Pennsylvania, in the Chair. Prayer was offered by Rev. W. T. Long, of Florida. The minutes of the last meeting were read, and G. A. Mabson, of North Carolina, moved their approval with the necessary corrections. Bishop Campbell was not satisfied with the portion of the minutes which stated that the report of the committee on the formation of a National League had been adopted and~the report referred back to the committee with certain instructions. He had come to the Convention to agitate the question of suffrage. They had but one object in view, and did not and could not approve of the plan of taking hold of a hundred subjects, and thought they would fail in the organization of a League if they were not careful. Mr. Everett, of Virginia, was also dissatisfied ~with the minutes, and wanted them corrected. Mr. Mabson, of North Carolina,Qthought the debate unnecessary, and called for the question on ~he approval of the minutes. Mr. Downing, of Rhode Island, was of the opinion that the report was re- ferred back to the committee. Several members rose to a point of order. Mr. Downing opposed the formation of an Equal Rights League. The im- pression had gone out of the Convention that the colored people had decided to disconnect themselves with other organizations, and form one of their own, and he would enter his solemn protest against the action of the Convention in sanctioning the organization of such a League. He thought it would be pro- ductive of evil to the colored men, and would work against them. Mr. Mabson called for the question on the approval of the minutes; and they were approved, as corrected. Hon. John Trimble, of Tennessee, was introduced to the Convention amid applause. Mr. Alexander Clark, of Iowa, offered the following: Resolved, That when this Convention adjourn it adjourn to meet on the second Tuesday in January, 1870, in the City of Baltimore. On motion, the resolution was laid on the table. Mr. Green, of Pennsylvania, i~resented a letter of fraternal greeting from the District Grand Lodge of Good Samaritans and Daughters of Sai aria. Referred to the Committee on Equal Rights League. Mr. Clark ~tated that he held in his ir ud a proclamation from the Governor, of Iowa, striking out the word white from the Constitution of that State. He mox ed it be spi cad on the minutes of the Convention. Carried.
You don't have permission to discuss this page.