- A Brief Introduction to the Movement
- To Stay or To Go?: The National Emigration Convention of 1854
- The 1853 Manual Labor College Initiative
- Bishop Henry McNeal Turner
- Mobility, Migration, and the 1855 Philadelphia National Convention
- Henry Highland Garnet's "Address"
- What Did They Eat? Where Did They Stay?
- Black Wealth and the 1843 Convention
- Black Women's Economic Power
- The First National Convention
- The "Conventions" of the Conventions: Political Rituals
- A National Press? The 1847 National Convention and the North Star
- Equality Before the Law: California Black Convention Activism, 1855-65
- Conflict on the Ohio: The 1858 Convention in Cincinnati
- Conventions by City
- National Conventions
- Women Delegates
- Women in the Conventions
- Convention Hosts by Denomination
- Conventions by Level
- Clusters of Conventions
- Colored Conventions in Canada
- Women in the Conventions | March 8, 2017
- Douglass Day
- About Us
- Contact Us
Scripto | Transcribe Page
Proceedings of the National Convention of the Colored Men of America: held in Washington, D.C., on January 13, 14, 15, and 16, 1869.
1869 National Convention in Washington DC 31.pdf
This page has been marked complete.
- Type what you see in the pdf, even if it's misspelled or incorrect.
- Leave a blank line before each new paragraph.
- Type page numbers if they appear.
- Put unclear words in brackets, with a question mark, like: [[Pittsburg?]]
- Click "Save transcription" frequently!
- Include hyphens splitting words at the end of a line. Type the full word without the hyphen. If a hyphen appears at the end of a page, type the full word on the second page.
- Include indents, tabs, or extra spaces.
Current Saved Transcription [history]
received the nomination for Senator from Missouri, which was received with applause.
Mr. Whipper, of the Finance Committee, stated that they had collected about $126, and offered a resolution asking Delegates to make up the amount due by their absent colleagues, which, he said, would make up about $320.
Mr. Matthews, of Baltimore, stated that there were a number of Delegates present who refused to pay their dues.
He was requested to hand the names of such gentlemen to the Secretary.
Mr. J. M. Langston, of Ohio, insisted upon knowing what bills were stand-ing against the Convention, that they might know what they were paying for
Mr. Matthews reported that it was printing, &c.
Mr. Langston stated that the report showed that none but colored men had charged them for printing, and he moved that further action on the part of the Finance Committee looking to raising money for publishing the proceedings of this Convention, be suspended until a full report is had from the Business Coin- mittee, and we have opportunity to determine whether matter reported by them is worthy of more permanent form of publication than that given by the newspapers of the country.
He said that the colored men of this country must come up on three things, viz: education, character, and crowning these two, the almighty dollar. [Applause.]
Mr. Whipper insisted upon his resolution.
Mr. Downing, Chairman of the Business Committee, said that a sub-committee was arranging an address to go before the American people, and that a committee had been appointed, with Mr. Weir, as their chairman, to go before the Judiciary Committee upon the suffrage question, and he thought that ought to be published, and if so, it must be paid for.
Joseph Mitchell, of Alabama, was enrolled as a Delegate.
Mr. Bowers, of Pennsylvania, spoke at length in favor of the resolution offered by Mr. Whipper, and of having the proceedings published in pamphlet form.
Mr. Weir thought that even in business matters there was such a thing as being penny wise and pound foolish. He opposed Mr. Langston's motion. They wanted to show the contentrated wisdom of their people, and how would they feel to lay a newspaper on a Congressman's table and say: "Mr., here is last weeks newspaper." No, sir, he wanted it in pamphlet form, that they might present them to those who are not here to hear the proceedings.
Mr. Sorrell, of Baltimore, stated that if it would only stop the discussion he would say for the Delegates of his State, that they would be responsible for the entire debt standing against the Convention.
The previous question on Mr. Whippers resolution was not seconded.
The question was then put on Mr. Langston's motion and carried.
Rev. Rufus L. Perry, of New York, offered the following:
You don't have permission to discuss this page.